|
|
|
The "Bressler Report" Note: This is the text of an FDA report on Searle (Part 5 of 5 ... Pages 69 - 76) EIR 4/25/77 to 8/4/77 Searle Laboratories JSA/DME/JT/LF Div. G.D. Searle & Co. 4901 Searle Parkway Skokie, Illinois 60076 (Page 69) When this study was reviewed by the Bureau of Foods in l975, the dose-related incidence of uterine polyps was noted. The appropriate slides were requested by FDA at that time and were reviewed by three groups of pathologists: 1.) The Division of Pathology, Bureau of Foods, 2.) Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, 3.) Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Copies of the reports submitted by the 3 groups and related correspondence were obtained and are attached as exhibits #43-45. Dr. Rudolph Stejskal was responsible for the microscopic findings and accuracy on these findings in the submission to FDA. Only Dr. Stejskal's name appears on the submission. However, a Dr. Joseph H. Smith, M.D. also read slides for this study and his initials appear on some of the microscopic examination sheets. Dr. Frith questioned some of the terminology used in describing tissues. Dr. Stejskal stated that Dr. Smith had come directly to SEarle from a hospital situation. Due to his human pathology background, his description of animal tissues was somewhat different than that used by veterinary pathologists. Dr. Stejskal joined SEarle in July of l973, therefore, he had no input into the pathology protocol, since E-77/78 was initiated in November of l971. No microscopic worksheets or other "raw data" relating to microscopic pathology could be found for study E-77/78. We were told by Searle personnel that the original microscopic findings were dictated by the pathologists (Stejskal & Smith) onto belts, and then typed onto sheets which were placed in a binder. The belts were then discarded and apparently the bound microscopic pathology sheets were either discarded or lost, after the study report was written. Therefore our verification of the microscopic findings submitted to FDA was limited to a complete inventory of the slides and tissue blocks and microscopic examination of a representative number of slides by Dr. Frith. Our inventory of the slides and tissue blocks for each animal included a complete list on the tissues sectioned, the number of slides made from each tissue, and a complete count of the total number of slides and blocks for each animal. We also checked the identification numbers on every slide and tissue block. We examined a total of 7,872 slides and 7,360 tissue blocks. The average number of organs submitted for tissue processing was (69) 20 per animal. No errors in slide identification were noted, although in many cases the number of organs submitted for sec- tioning was less than specified in the protocol. A detailed dis- cussion of this can be found under the heading PROTOCOL. In addition to the discrepancies noted by Dr. Frith, some other errors were noted in the submission to FDA. A mammary tumor found in rat F27CF was described as a papillary cystadenoma on the individual pathology sheet (page 105, Volume II of the submission to FDA) and as an adenocarcinoma on the summary table 12, page 96, Volume I of the submission to FDA. Page 92, Volume I of the submission to FDA (a summary table) reports that animal J23CM was found dead after 754 days on study, while the individual pathology sheet for this animal (page 56, Volume II of the submission to FDA) reported that the animal was found dead after 620 days on study. The correct figure is 620 days, since J23CM was placed on the study on 11/17/72 and was found dead on 7/29 /73. In several instances the histopathology technician made notes at the bottom of the gross pathology sheet to indicate that certain organs were not present in the bottle of fixative. (and were therefore not available for sectioning). Yet in three of these instances (animals A4CM, K23CF, and J3CM) a diagnosis appears in the submission to FDA. CHARTS, DIAGRAMS AND TABLES It was necessary to construct a number of charts, diagrams and tables to facilitate our review of the data. For example we constructed a chart, by housing group, showing the identification and complete pathology history of each of the 360 animals. We also rearranged this chart into dosage groups, a copy of which is attached as exhibit #35. To compare survival data it was necessary to construct a survival table. This also involved devising a calendar to show days and weeks on study for each housing group, taking into account the starting dates for each group. This also included tables showing the numbers of days and weeks animals were on study and a table comparing the survival data from various sources. We constructed a chart showing diet calculations (gm./kg) and total amounts of DKP used (gm./batch). This is attached as exhibit #30. (70) Three tables were constructed which summarize the FDA statistical analysis of body/feeder weight data. They are attached as exhibits #39-41. All of the charts, diagrams and tables that we constructed are attached to the report as exhibits and are referred to in various sections of the report. EXHIBITS #1. G.D. Searle & Company Annual Report for l976. #2. Organizational Chart of Pharmaceutical/Consumer Products Group. #3. Organizational Chart of World Wide Pharmaceutical R&D Group. #4. Organizational Chart of Preclinical R&D Group. #5. Organizational Chart of Product Safety Assessment Group. #6. Copies of Computer-Generated Randomization Tables used by Searle to assign the Dose & Housing Groups. #7. Diagram showing Typical Housing Group of 30 animals, containing a random distribution of control and treated animals. #8. Diagram showing arrangement of food cups on cart, used in feeding the animals. #9. Copy of "Glossary of Terms for Aspartame and its Diketopiperazine" and "Analytical Data and Specifications of Food Grade Aspartame". #10. Copy of shipping labels for rats received from #11. Copy of protocol with amendments for Study P.T. 988S73 (E-77/78). #12. Copies of CV's for principal persons involved in study E-77/78. #13. Copies of Batch Records for the manufacture of DKP, lots 1R through 5R. #14. Copies of pages from SEarle chemist Jack Drogt's notebook, con- cerning the manufacture of DKP. #15. Copies of Analytical Reports for DKP, lots 1R through 7R. #16. Copy of Searle memorandum dated 12/4/69, concerning DKP Specifica- tions. #17. Copy of DKP Specification Sheet (not dated) entitled "Tenative Specifications for SC-19192". (71) #18. Copy of DKP Specification Sheet entitled "Specifications for SC-19192, Specification #C40606C". #19. Copies of pages 75-84 & 285 of lab notebook #AR-39, concerning assay of DKP, lots 1R, 2R & 3R. #20. Copies of pages 60-63 of lab notebook VSH-I, and page 269 of lab notebook book #AR-23, pertaining to analysis of DKP lot 4R. #21. Copies of pages 250, 251 and 257 of lab notebook #AR-57, and pages 44-49 of lab notebook #AR-68, pertaining to analysis of DKP lot 5R. #22. Copies of pages 83-86 of lab notebook #AR-77, concerning analysis of DKP lot 6R. #23. Copy of page 31 of lab notebook #AR-93, concerning analysis of DKP lot 7R. #24. Copy of protocol for DKP stability study, dated 1/13/72. #25. Copies of pages 51-56 of laboratory notebook #AR-49, assigned to C. Seul. These pages describe a preliminary TLC Test for recovery of DKP from the diet mixture. #26. Copies of pages 53-59, 67-72, 88-89, 106-107, 144-145, 156-157, and 284-285 of laboratory notebook #AR-51, assigned to Barbara Bickford. These pages refer to the assay procedure and methods for the DKP Stability Study. #27. Copies of Analytical Reports for DKP Stability Study. #28. Copies of DKP Compound Inventory Cards. #29. Two photographs showing a non-homogeneous sample of DKP diet mixture. #30. Chart showing diet calculations (gm.kg.) and total amounts of DKP used (gm./batch). #31. Two memos dated 7/14/77 from Thomas F.X. Collins concerning interview with Ray Schroeder. #32. Memo dated 7/19/77 from Thomas F. X. Collins describing the 7/18/77 interview with Ray Schroeder. #33. Memo of Telephone Conversation between Jerome Bressler and Attorney John H. Bickley Jr., dated July 25, l977. #34. Copies of records concerning calculation of diet concentrations, food concentrations prediction records, dates of bath mixing, and calcu- lation of mean food intake values. #35. Charts organized by dose group, showing the identification and pathology history of each of the 360 animals on study. #36. Memo dated April 5, l976, from Dr. John H. Rust to Dr. R. McConnell. #37. Searle memo dated September 30, l974, by Dr. McConnell. (72) #38. Memo dated August 29, l974 from Dr. G. L. Schoenhard to Dr. K.S. Rao. #39. Table 1 - Summary of Average Body Weights and Weight gain (%change/ week) from the FDA Statistical Analysis. #40. Table 2 - Summary of food intake (g/day and g/kg./day and dosage (mg./kg./day) from the FDA STatistical Analysis #41. Table 3 - Summary of Food Efficiency (g. gained/100g. actual food consumed) calculated in the FDA STatistical Analysis. #42. Computer printout of FDA Statistical Analysis of food intake and body weight data. #43. Pathology report from Division of Pathology, Bureau of Foods, con- cerning uterine polyps, along with correspondence, and memo from Janet Springer. #44. Pathology report from Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, concerning uterine polyps. #45. Pathology report from Massachusetts Institute of Technology, concern- ing uterine polyps. #46. Written account of interviews with Dr. Jean Taylor on 6/2/77, 6/3/77, and 6/7/77. #47. Written account of interview with Judy Beauchamp on 6/2/77. #48. Written account of interview with Barbara Bickford on 6/1/77. #49. Written account of interview with Clifford J. Seul on 6/2/77. #50. Written account of interview with Bartolome R. Tangonan on 6/1/77. #51. Written account of interviews with Tony Martinez on 5/19/77,6/3/77, 7/7/77, and 8/2/77. #52. Written account of interview with Ted Reichert on 5/24/77. #53. Written account of interview with Barbara Bickford and Clif Seul on 6/2/77. #54. Written account of interview with Judith Schmal on 6/2/77 and 6/7/77. #55. List of animals bled at 104 and 114 weeks. #56. Written account of interview with Alan Mitchell on 7/20/77. #57. Written account of interview with Raymond G. Schroeder on 7/18/77. #58. Injection records showing administration of penicillin, dates of administration, rat numbers, and units injected. #59. Methodology for "Phenistix" determination of phenylketones in urine. (73) #60. Dr. Frith's report of examination of slides for DKP study (E-77/78). #61. Key for animal identification card numbers used on the body/feeder weight teletype sheets. #62. Chart correlating animal cage numbers with pathology numbers, arranged by dose group. #63. Chronological list of pathology numbers and corresponding animal cage numbers. #64. Organizational charts showing responsibility during the time that study E-77/78 was conducted. #65. Volume entitled "tissue masses & deaths". Chronological list of all animals that died, during study, and dates that masses were first observed. #66. Charts of days on study for each animal. #67. Calendar for duration of study showing starting dates, days and weeks for each group. #68. Survival table. #69. Charts of Housing/Dosage Groups. #70. "Observations for Drug Effects" records for housing groups A through F. #71. "Observations for Drug Effects" records for housing groups G through M. #72. Ophthalmoscopic records and copies of pathology sheets that have ophthalmoscopic findings. #73. Life table analysis and statistics on body weight and food consumption data by Dennis Wilson, Div. of Mathematics, Bureau of Foods. #74. Evaluation of feeding study on DKP, a conversion product of Aspartame, by Janet Springer/Ann Ducca, FDA Division on Mathematics. #75. Volume A - teletype sheets for body and feeder weight data, housing groups. Volume B - " Volume C - " #76. Copy of Searle Computer Program. #77. Volume of protocols, organ weights, dosage, hematology, urinalysis, blood chemistry, and protein electrophoresis. #78. Complete gross pathology sheets, males. #79. Complete gross pathology sheets, females. #80. Key to slide tissue identification numbers and abbreviations. #81. Key to stain abbreviations. (74) #82. Copies of submission appendix tables relating to hematology, clinical chemistry, urinalysis, and electrophoresis, along with check marks showing errors, and attached copies of raw data sheets documenting the errors. #83. Copies of submission appendix tables for organ weights, with errors indicated, and copies of pathology sheets documenting the errors. #84. Data sheets showing the phenylketones test erroneously labeled "phenylalanine". Signed by: John S. Arnold Investigator David M. Eerspamer Investigator Dr. Jean Taylor Toxicologist Dr. Leonard Friedman Biochemist (75) Addendum: Exhibit #85 - Copy of Volume 1 of the submission to FDA. Exhibit #86 - Copy of Volume 2 of the submission to FDA, consisting of the individual pathology summaries, both gross and microscopic. Exhibit #87 - Statistical analysis of Blood and Clinical Chemistry Data by Dennis Wilson, Division of Mathematics, HFF- 110. Exhibit #88 - Copies of pages from Histology accession book #770C, and Histology inventory sheets. Exhibit #89 - Documents from Searle's Math-Stat. Dept. concerning statistical analysis of study 988S73. Signed Jerome Bressler Team Leader (76)
|
|
|
|
|
|