index


Forward:

As is, the HTML code for this report is almost 200kb... too much for one page. This entire report can be downloaded as either bressler.zip or bressler.exe for those who would rather read OFF-LINE, or who just want a copy.

   To aid in ON-LINE reading please note that each page of the report has an embedded "page number" in the form "pagename.html#XX" where the XX is the number of the page you want to reference.   So, if you wanted to reference page #66, then you will have to know the name of the file.html and just add the #XX after that filename.   Example: http://www.dorway.com/bressler.html#22 will take you to page 22 of the first section. Pages for this report are named:

bressler.html, (pages 1 to 10) Part 1 of 5
bresslr2.html, (pages 11 to 30) Part 2 of 5
bresslr3.html, (pages 31 to 50) Part 3 of 5
bresslr4.html, (pages 51 to 68) Part 4 of 5
bresslr5.html, (pages 69 to 76) Part 5 of 5
to reduce the Internet page loading times.

   In addition, comments by those who can help the layman to better understand what is being read will be placed as appropriate.




               The "Bressler Report"

       Note: This is the text of an FDA report on Searle
                (Part 4 of 5 ... Pages 51-68)

EIR 4/25/77 to 8/4/77                      Searle Laboratories
JSA/DME/JT/LF                              Div. G.D. Searle & Co.
                                           4901 Searle Parkway
                                           Skokie, Illinois 60076
(Page 51)

   As described by Judith R. Schmal (June 7, 1977) the method
   used from November 1971 to February 1, 1974 was adapted
   from Fermco Kit Bulletins #20 and 20-1.  Urea is hydrolyzed
   to ammonia and carbonic acid in the presence of urease.
   Ammonia is detected by the Berthelot reaction to produce
   indophenol.  From February 1, 1974 the "direct serum methond"
   modified from the method of Marsh et al was used.

   4)  Phenylalanine

       Reference: Hill, J. B., Summer, G. K. Pencer, M. W. Resz
       N.O. (1965) Chin Chem 11, 541

   From Nov. 1971 to about Septembe 1972 there is no documenta-
   tion in file as to method used.  From about September 1972
   the method used was a flurometric determination in the pre-
   sence of ninhydrin and l-leucyl-l-alanine as adapted from
   McCaman and Rubins.  (This is a manual method modified for
   automation by Hill et al - reverenced above) (Judith R.
   Schmal, June 7, 1977)

   5)  Calcium:
       Reference Pybus J., (Pylrus in submission), Feldman, F. J.,
       and Browers (Borrers in Submission) Jr., G. N. (1970) Clin.
       Chem. 16 (11 in submission), 998.

   The referenced method involves the measurement of total cal-
   cium in serum by atomic absorption spectrophotometry.  As
   described by Judith R. Schmal (June 7, 1977) from November,
   1961 to February 1974  the procedure used was a colorimetric
   procedure using Corinth dye as adapted from Kingsley and
   Robnet.  From May 21, 1973 the method used was atomic absorp-
   tion spectrophotometry, as adapted from Pybus et all
   (reference above)

   6)  Total Cholesterol

       Reference:  Levine J. S., Morgenstern, S., and Vlastelica,
       D. (1968).  Automation Anal Chem. pp 25-28, Technicon
       Symposia 1968.

   We were unable to check the above reference because of diffi-
   culty up to now in obtaining a copy of the publication, but as
   shown below two different procedures were employed to measure
   total serum cholesterol at different times during the study.

                           (51)

   (Judith R. Schmal, June 7, 1977).  From November 1971 to
   July 2, 1973 the method involved reacting an isopropanol
   extract of serum with ferric chloride (modified from Block,
   Tirret and Levine). From July 2, 1973 the method used was a
   direct serum method using a modified Lieberman - Burchard
   reaction.

   7)  Glucose

       Reference:  Frings, C.S., Ratliff, C.R. and Dunn, R.T.
       (1969) Advances in Automated Analysis 1, 73

   This reference was not checked (because of difficulty up
   to now in obtaining a copy of the publication) but as shown
   below two different procedures were employed to measure
   serum glucose at different times during the study (Judith
   R. Schmal, June 7, 1977).

   From November 1971 to October 16, 1972 the method was a
   glucose oxidase determination (modified Gertrud Acrow)
   using protein free filtrates.  From October 16, 1972 the
   method was a direct serum O-Toluidine reaction as modi-
   fied from Frings, Ratlif and Dunn.

   In the case of four of the above parameters (glutamic pyruvic
   transaminase, glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase, blood urea
   nitrogen and calcium) different methodology was used during
   part of the study then was indicated in the submission.  For
   one parameter (phenylalanine), there was no documentation as
   to the method used for one period of the study and for two
   other parameters (total cholesterol and glucose), two different
   methods were used for each of the parameters while only
   one was referenced in the submission.

   Alkaline phosphatase was measured generally as referenced
   in the submission (McComb, R.B. and Borrers, G.N. (1972).
   Clin. CHem., 18, 97 in that the method involved measuring
   the production of p-nitrophenol from p-nitrophenylphosphate
   However starting July, 1973 there was a "re-optimization of
   reagent concentrations" (Judith R. Small, June 7, 1977).

   The above changes in procedure could conceivably result in dif-
   ferences in the apparent absolute values for the concentration
   of the substances measured.  Changes in the method of conver-
   sion of raw data to calculated values as was don in the
   determination of sodium and potassium by atomic absorption
   spectrophotometry during different periods of the study,
   (Judth R.Schmal, June 7, 1977) could also possibly produce
   differences in final values.

                           (52)

   In an interview with Judith Schmal on June 2, 1977, she did state
   in response to a question that two levels of "Serum Controls" were
   used in each run to check the method and instruments and that the
   data was not reported if the values were more than two standard
   deviations greater than that for the expected values.

   NO evidence was obtained that any attempts were made to determine
   whether or not DKP cold interfere with any of the clinical lab-
   oratory tests conducted.  For that matter no information was made
   available to us as to whether DKP itself or related compounds did
   appear in the blood or the urine of rats fed diet containing this
   compound.

   Neither, as a result of interviews held or reference to available
   laboratory notebooks were we able to obtain information helpful
   in explaining the unusually low values for BUN for the control
   males at treatment days 189 and 364 and for all the treated male
   groups at treatment day 364.  No raw laboratory data in reference
   to this could be found and may have been recorded on discarded
   teletype sheets referred to previously.  In reference to the
   low BUN values, Page 29 of the submission contains the following
   statement: "BUN" values for the control males at treatment
   day 189 were unusually low and may possibly be related to
   a technical artefact; as a result, the group mean values for
   all treated males at this interval were significantly higher
   but, in fact, these values were in the normal range.  BUN values
   both in control and al treated male groups at treatment
   day 364 were unusually low;  this again reflects a possible
   technical artefact."

      F.  A total of 21 disparities between individual clinical
          laboratory analysis values appearing in the submission
          Volume I and those values appearing in data sheets and/
          or laboratory notebooks were found (Table 4).  Of these,
          17 were in hematology, one in clinical chemistry, and three
          in urinalysis.  As a result of the discussion with Robert
          Bost, it was apparent that some of the hematology
          discrepancies may have resulted for Searle personnel
          mistaking recorded instrument readings for calculated
          values.  In two cases no value or crossed out values
          appeared in the laboratory notebooks while values were
          found entered onto the appropriate places in the data
          sheets.  For animal number A01HM and treatment day 546
          four discrepancies (hematocrit, hemoglobin, RBC and WBC)
          were noted.

                           (53)

G. Discrepancies Found In Statistical Analysis:

   The mean and standard errors for the three dose levels and
   the controls for the various measurements using the values
   in the submission Volume I or values noted in the data sheets
   (where there values differed from those found in the submis-
   sion) were calculated by the Division of Mathematics, FDA.
   Also supplied were the results of the T-TEsts comparing the con-
   trols to the treated groups.  See memo to Leonard Friedman
   from Dennis Wilson, dated July 20, 1977 with attached Tables
   1 and 2 (Exhibit #87).

   A total of 49 disparities were found, which were comprised of
   6 means, 23 standard errors and 20 significant differences.
   As stated in the memo, in all cases where there is a disparity,
   it appears to be due to differences in the data.

   Calculations were also carried out for cholesterol data found
   in the data sheets but not reported in the submission.  As
   shown in Table 5 the mean values for the median and high
   level treated females and the high level treated males were
   significantly lower than the mean values for the respective
   controls.  To illustrate the possible significance of these
   changes and disparities between the values calculated by
   Searle and FDA for cholesterol data at the other time
   periods of treatment, table 5 was constructed.  Very few
   disparities are seen between the calculated values obtained
   by FDA and those in the submission but a fairly consistent
   trend is seen for treatment related lowering of serum
   cholesterol, particularly at the two highest dose levels
   and for the female rats.

   Because additional disparities were recently noted in
   individual hematology values after these statistical
   computations by FDA were completed (due to the discovery
   of additional laboratory notebooks), and addendum to this
   report regarding the statistical disparities reported here
   will be forthcoming.

                           (54)

                    TABLE 5

        TOTAL SERUM CHOLESTEROL (MG/DL)          

TREATMENT    42    92    189    364    734    798
GROUP
-
-
-
-
-
-
        THIS ENTIRE PAGE OF DATA GUTTED
        BEFORE RELEASE OF THIS REPORT
        UNDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORATION ACT!

        WHAT DID THE FDA DECIDE TO KEEP FROM
        THE PUBLIC IT "PROTECTS"?
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

                           (55)

GROSS PATHOLOGY

The pathologists responsible for the microscopic examination (Rudolph
Stejskal and Joseph smith) did not perform the necropsies.  Necropsies
were performed by Tony Martinez, David Kie and Robert Spaet, with the two
pathologists avilable for consultation.

The submission to FDA (Vol 1, p. 7) reported that "Rats found dead during
the study were autopsied immediately whenever possible.  In cases where
the ncropsy could not be performed promptly, the thoracic and abdominal
cavities of dead rats were opened and the entire animal was immersed in
neutral buffered formalin fixative for subsequent gross examination and
dissection".

Our examination of gross pathology records showed that 98 of the 196
animals that died during the study were fixed in toto and autopsied at
some later date, in some cases more than one year later.

A total of 20 animals were excluded from the study due to excessive
autolysis.  Of these, 17 had been fixed in toto and autopsied at a later
date.  Following are the twenty animals excluded from the study:

Animal No               Date Found Dead             Date Autopsied

C21CM                      7/3/73                      1/11/74
G16CM                      9/21/73                     1/11/74
G18CM                      8/11/73                     10/4/73
G26CM                      4/2/73                      1/11/74

J2CM                       5/21/73                     1/11/74
J5CM                       10/30/72                    11/8/72
L10CM                      3/29/73                     1/11/74
L15/CM                     9/9/73                      1/11/74
L21CM                      4/13/73                     1/11/74
L11LM                      5/6/73                      1/9/74
A14MM                      5/21/73                     1/9/74
G28MM                      1/5/74                      1/7/74
J25MM                      5/24/73                     5/24/73
A3HN                       6/17/73                     1/9/74
C15HM                      1/7/74                      1/7/74

                           (56)

Animal No                  Date Found Dead            Date Autopsied

G13HM                          7/25/73                   **1/9/74
H24CF                          4/29/73                     1/11/74
D4HF                           7/11/73                     7/11/73
D16HF                          *4/2/73                     1/8/74
F6HF                           1/5/74                      1/7/74

*Although the date found dead was listed as 4/12/73 on the gross pathology
 sheet, the "Tissue Masses & Deaths" book listed this date as 4/1/73.

**Although the date found dead was listed as 1/9/74 on the gross pathology
 sheet, the "Tissue Masses & Deaths" book listed this date as 7/25/73.

The gross pathology sheet for one of the above animals, F6HF, described a
tissue mass measuring 5.0 X 4.5X2.5 cm.  This tissue mass was first
observed on 8/24/73 according to the pathology sheet (Exhibit #79), the
observation records (Exhibit #70), and the palpation record in the "Tissue
Masses and Deaths" book (Exhibit #65).  The submission to FDA (Exhibit #8)
reported no tissue mass and the animal was excluded from the study due to
marked autolysis.

In addition to the above twenty animals that were excluded from the study,
many other animals exhibited marked autolysis.  For example, D27LF, M25CF,
and H12CF are all described grossly in the submission to FDA as follows;
"all organs examined grossly were markedly autolyzed".

Records for approximately 30 animals showed substantial differences
between gross observations on pathology sheets, when compared with the
individual pathology summaries submitted to FDA.  Following is a detailed
comparison of ten of these.  (Copies of all the gross pathology sheets,
and the pathology summaries submitted to FDA are attached as Exhibits #78,
#79, and #86).

A2CM

Submission to FDA:

  Lung         - Focal adhesion
  Adrenal      - Moderately enlarged

                           (57)

All other organs examined grossly were unremarkable.

Original Pathology Sheet:

Pituitary - Missing
Lung      - Left, mid-portion adheres to the medial area of
            the rib cage by a "fibrous" type of tissue.  (Sub-
            mitted together with relevant portion of the rib cage).

Right, post-caval lobe has undergone consolidation.  Contains
grayish-yellowish nodules measuring 2 x 2 mm.  (Entire lung
submitted in toto)

 Lymph NOdes, Pancreatic - Slightly enlarged

Adrenal   - Left, moderately enlarged.  Right and left, covered
            with tiny yellow spots measuring 1.0 x 1.0 mm.

Lymph Nodes, Mesenteric - moderately enlarged.
Mass - previously described on 8/20/73 has since then regressed.
Prostate - Marked atrophy, all lobes
Seminal Vesicles - Marked atrophy, bilaterally

All other organs examined were grossly normal and unremarkable.

M15CF

Submission:

  Mammary gland   - subcutaneous mass located in mid-thoracic
                    region measuring 7 x 6 x 2.5 cm.

  Urinary bladder - papillary growth in the lumen.

  All other organs examined grossly were unremarkable.

Original:

  Mass #1 - Previously described in the left inguinal region
            on 2/9/73 has since then regressed.

                           (58)

  Masses #2 and # - Located in the mid-axillary-cervical regions
                    are all on mass now measuring 7.0 x 6.0 x 2.5 cm
                    and may be described as irregular in shape, multi-
                    nodular, smooth-surfaced, non-glistening,
  No Spinal Cord    yellowish-purpulish in color, non-adherent to the
       VL           underlying muscle and containing a whitish-yellowish
                    firm tissue within.  (Submitted in toto together with
                    remainder of tissue).

Heart             - Left Ventricle - dilitation and walls thin.
Spleen            - Slightly enlarged
Liver             - Prominent lobular architecture.
Adrenal           - Left, slightly enlarged.  Right, unremarkable.
Ovary             - Right, small cyst measuring 4.0 x 4.0 mm and
                    distended with a clear yellow fluid.

  All other organs examined were grossly normal and unremarkable.

G10LM

Submission:

  Testis  - Marked atrophy, unilaterally.
  Kidney  - Moderate enlargement, mottled appearance, bilaterally.
  Small and large intestine exhibited moderate autolysis, no sections
  submitted.

  All other organs examined were grossly normal and unremarkable.

Original:

  Mass which was initially palpated on 2/9/72 (86 days Rx)
  in the left inguinal area was actually the left testis which
  ascended and went thru weakened left inguinal ring into the
  subcutaneous area.

  Testis  - Left (ascended) appears atrophied (submitted in toto).
  Kidney  - MOderate, diffuse and uniform enlargement, mottled,
            bilaterally (submitted in toto).
Small and large intestines are moderately autolyzed (no sections
submitted).
Thyroid   - Moderately enlarged, bilaterally.  A 2 mm in dia., dis-
            crete, sl raised, moderately firm yellowish-grey lesion
            is located in the posterior tip, bilaterally. (Thyroid
            submitted in toto wrapped in a lens paper).

  All other organs examined were grossly normal and unremarkable.

                           (59)

L11LM

Submission:

  Kidney     - Mottled appearance
  Testes     - Marked atrophy, bilaterally
  Prostate   - Marked atrophy

  All other organs examined grossly exhibited marked autolysis.

Original:

  Adrenal    - Pale yellow, bilaterally
  Kidney     - Pale yellow, bilaterally, rough-surfaced, bilaterally,
               moderately autolyzed, bilaterally, tiny spaces in the
               cortex region measuring about 1 mm in diameter,
               bilaterally.
  Testes     - Marked atrophy, bilaterally, marked autolysis,
               bilaterally.
  Prostate   - Marked atrophy, all lobes
  Seminal Vesicles - Marked atrophy, bilaterally
  Spleen     - Marked autolysis
  Pancreas   - Marked autolysis
  Stomach    - Marked autolysis.  A glandular portion - numerous, tiny,
               pitted ulcerations measuring 1 -4 mm in diameter.
  Lymph Nodes, Mesenteric - Marked autolysis
  Heart      - Wall of left ventricle thin
  Brain      - Marked autolysis
  Pituitary  - Marked autolysis
  Liver      - Marked autolysis

  All other organs examined were grossly normal and unremarkable.

M17LF

Submission:

  Pituitary        - Marked enlargement.
  Adrenal          - Markedly enlarged and hyperemic, bilaterally.
  Mammary Gland    - Mass 1, located subcutaneously in left axillary
                     region, measuring 3 X 3 X 2.5 cm; mass 2, located
                     subcutaneously adjacent to mass 1, measuring 3 X 2
                     X 1 cm; mass 3, located subcutaneously in the right
                     axillary region, measuring 2.5 X 2 X 1 cm; mass 4,

                           (60)

                     located subcutaneously in the left inguinal region,
                     measuring 3 X 1 X 1 cm; mass 5, located subcutane-
                     ously in the right inguinal region, measuring 2 X
                     1.5 X 1 cm.

  All other organs examined grossly were unremarkable.

Original

   Pit         - appears markedly hyperemic
   Adrenal     - Exhibits numerous minute greyish spots on the serosal
                 surface bilaterally.  It appears markedly enlarged.

   Mass (1)    - A 3 X 3 X 2.5 cm. spheroidal, multinodular, yellowish
                 white, slightly firm mass located subcutaneously in
                 the left axillary area.  Mass non-adherent to the
                 surrounding muscles or tissue (submitted in toto).

   Mass (2)    - A 2.5 X 2 X 1 cm spheroidal, smooth, yellowish white
                 firm mass located subcutaneously and adjacent to the
                 above described mass (submitted in toto) mass non-
                 adherent to the surrounding muscles or tissues.

   Mass (3)    - A 2.3 X 2 X 1 cm. irregularly shaped, multinodular,
                 yellowish white, firm mass located subcutaneously on
                 the rt. axillary area.  Mass non-adherent to the
                 surrounding muscles or tissues (submitted in toto).

   Mass (4)    - A 3 X 1 X 1 cm. elongated, multinodular, yellowish
                 white, firm mass located subcutaneously on the left
                 inguinal area.  Mass non-adherent to the surrounding
                 muscles or tissues (submitted in toto).

   Mass (5)    - A 2 X 1.5 X 1 cm. flat, multinodular, yellowish white,
                 firm mass located subcutaneously on the rt. inguinal
                 area.  Mass non-adherent to the surrounding muscles
                 or tissues (submitted in toto).

   All other organs examined were grossly normal and unremarkable.

C1MM

Submission

   Kidney        Marked enlargement with yellowish discoloration.
   Testis        Marked atrophy, bilaterally.

                           (61)

Tissue mass located subcutaneously in the right inguinal area measuring
2.5 X 1 cm.

All other organs examined grossly were unremarkable.

Original:

  Mass       - Previously described on 12/9/72 and located subcutaneously
               in the right inguinal area now measures 2.5 X 2.0 X 1.0
               cm and may be described as smooth-surfaced, purplish-
               yellowish in color, non-glistening, firm, multi-nodular,
               non-adherent to the underlying muscles and containing a
               firm yellowish-whitish tissue.  (Submitted in toto
               together with a portion of the skin and underlying muscle
               with remainder of tissue).
  Heart      - Left ventricle has undergone a moderate amount of dili-
               tation.  Wall, left ventricle is thin.
  Liver      - Prominent lobular architecture.
  Lung       - Right, post-caval lobe-consolidation.
  Kidney     - Markedly enlarged, yellow and rough-surfaced, bilaterally.
               Dilitation of the pelvis.
  Adrenal    - Covered with tiny yellow spots measuring 1 mm in diameter,
               bilaterally.

  Testes     - Marked atrophy, bilaterally.

  All other organs examined were grossly normal and unremarkable.

Tiss. Trimming -  Nodules discovered immediately posterior (2.0 cm) to
                  the pyloric portion of the stomach within the adipose
                  tissue.  Nodules may be described as firm, yellowish
                  brownish in color.  Non-glistening measuring 1.2 X
                  1.0 mm to 4.0 X 4.0 mm.

E27MM

Submission:

  Lung         - Moderate diffuse hyperemia.
  Eye          - Opaque cornea, bilaterally.

  All other organs examined grossly were unremarkable

Original:

   Lungs - All lobes exhibit moderate diffuse and uniform hyperemia.

                           (62)

   Kidney      - Moderate autolysis.
   Eye         - The entire cornea is opaque, bilaterally.
   Spleen      - Moderately autolyzed.
   Stomach     - Numerous 1-2 mm. hemorrhagic ulcerations are located on
                 the glandular mucosa.  Entire small and large intestines

                 are moderately autolyzed.
   Brain & Pituitary - Moderately autolyzed.

   All other organs examined were grossly normal and unremarkable.

A1HM

Submission:

   All organs examined were grossly unremarkable.

Original:

   Testes       - Markedly atrophy, bilaterally
   Lung, Rt     - Middle lobe exhibits a 1 X 1 cm consolidation on the
                  posterior portion.
   Liver        - All lobes appear olive green otherwise unremarkable.

   All other organs examined were grossly normal and unremarkable.

L27HM:

Submission:

    Testes      - Right, slightly enlarged; left, mild atrophy.

    All other organs examined grossly were unremarkable.

Original:

    Testes      - lt./appears markedly atrophy
                  rt./appears to be distended with yellowish white
                  substance

    Seminal V-  Appears markedly atrophy bilaterally.
    Intestinal  - Large, markedly distended with "gas".

All other organs examined were grossly normal and unremarkable.

    P.M. Testes - Also, small black areas are noted within along with
                  the yellowish areas.  Black areas measuring 1.0 X 1.0 to
                  4.0 X 4.0 mm in diameter.

                           (63)

J30HM

Submission:

   Lung    - Moderate consolidation of all right lobes.
   Testis  - Moderate atrophy

   All other organs examined grossly were unremarkable.

Original:

   Pituitary  - Markedly enlarged; slightly hyperemic.
   Heart      - Left Ventricle has undergone dilitation walls thin.
   Lung       - Right, anterior, medial and post-caval lobe have
                undergone consolidation.
   Testes     - Marked atrophy, bilaterally.

   Seminal Vesicle - Marked atrophy, bilaterally.

   All other organs examined were grossly normal and unremarkable.

Dr. Stejskal told us that the other pathologist (Dr. Joseph Smith) who
made microscopic evaluations of the slides, came from a hospital
background (human pathology) and therefore his descriptions and
terminology were a little bit different than one would expect from a
veterinary pathologist.

MICROSCOPIC PATHOLOGY

We have assisted in our review of the Microscopic Pathology of Study
E-77/78 by Charles H. Frith, D.V.M., Ph.D, Director, Pathology Services,
NCTR.  Dr. Frith arrived on 6/22/77 and spent 3 days with the FDA team.
He examined slides for a representative number of animals, the selection
of which was made jointly by Dr. Frith and the other members of the FDA
team.  A Searle Pathologist was not present during Dr. Frith's review of
the slides.  However, Dr. Frith did meet with Dr. Rudolf Stejskal, SEarle
Pathologist, at the conclusion of this review and discussed some of his
findings with him.

The first phase of Dr. Frith's review consisted of the examination of the
tissues of 25 of the surviving control females and 11 of the non-surviving
control females for a total of 36 animals.  All of the slides were
examined for each animal and the results were compared to the microscopic
reports provided by Searle Laboratories.  The inconsistencies (findings
that differed from those reported by Searle) are listed below:

                           (64)

In most cases the inconsistencies represent findings that were not
diagnosed or reported by Searle.  Copies of Searle's microscopic pathology
reports for each of the animals listed below are attached as exhibit #60.

       Female Rat No. F13CF  (Path. No. 95617)
          Small Intestine - Diverticulum with mucosal necrosis and
          cellular inflammatory infiltrate.

       Female Rat No. F15CF  (Path No. 95618)
          Pancreas - Focal hyperplasia

       Female Rat No. F16CF  (Path No. 95619)
          Heart - Focal Fibrosis.
          Kidney - Mild chronic nephritis.

       Female Rat No. H10CF (Path 95624)
          Ovary - Neoplasm - probably granulosa cell tumor.

       Female Rat No. H19CF  (Path. No. 95626)
          Kidney - Focal calcification.
          Ovary  - Neoplasm - probably granulosa cell tumor.

       Female Rat No. H30CF (Path. No. 95628)
          Kidney - Focal calcification.

       Female Rat - No. K25CF (Path No. 95630)
          Kidney  - Focal calcification.

       Female Rat No. K29CF (Path No. 95631)
          Heart   - Focal fibrosis
          Kidney  - Focal calcification

       Female Rat No. M4CF  (Path No. 95632)
          Liver   - Focal hyperplasia

       Female Rat No. M10CF  (Path No. 95634)
          Kidney  - Focal calcification.
          Pituitary - Adenoma
          Ovary   - Fibrosis and Pigmentation.

                           (65)

       Female Rat No. M15CF  (Path No. 95635)
           Pituitary   - Adenoma.
           Ovary       - Cyst.

       Female Rat No. B30CF  (Path No. 95801)
           Kidney      - Focal calcification.

       Female Rat D29CF  (Path No. 95803)
           Urinary Bladder (1)  Chronic diffuse inflammation.
                           (2)  Diffuse mild hyperplasia.

The second phase of the review consisted of the microscopic examination of
all tissues from the high dose females - a total of 36 animals.  The
inconsistencies are listed below:

       Female Rat No. B14HF  (Path. No. 95657)
         Eye was reported as not examined but eye was present and
         normal.

       Female Rat No. F25HF (Path. No. 95823)
         Urinary Bladder - Mild diffuse hyperplasia.

       Female Rat No. H7HF (Path No. 95623)
         Ovary - Neoplasm - probably granulosa cell tumor.

       Female Rat No. H9HF (Path No. 95665)
         Heart - Focal fibrosis.
         Urinary Bladder - Mild focal hyperplasia.

       Female Rat No. H15HF  (Path No. 95665)
         Lymph Node - The diagnosis of lymphoma, benign, was present on
         the Searle microscopic report.  According to Dr. Frith, lymphoma
         is generally not considered to be benign and he would diagnose
         lympphosarcoma.

       Female Rat NO. H18HF  (Path No. 95667)
         Pituitary - Adenoma.
         Brain - Mild bilateral hydrocephalus.

       Female Rat No. K18HF (Path No. 95824)
         Pituitary - Adenoma

       Female Rat No. K24HF (Path. No. 95671)
         Mass noted grossly - nothing consistent with mass reported
         microscopically.

                           (66)

      Female Rat No. - M2HF  (Path. No. 95672)
          Uterus - Chronic mild endometritis.

      Female Rat No. M30HF  (Path. No. 95343)
          Kidney - Focal calcification.
          Uterus - Chronic mild endometritis.

      Female Rat No. M30HF  (Path. No. 95675)
          Pancreas - Focal hyperplasia.

The third phase of this review consisted of microscopic verification of
all masses reported grossly at necropsy from all female animals not
examined in phases 1 and 2 and included a total of 73 animals.  The
inconsistencies are listed below:

      Female Rat No. D10Lf (Path No. 92521)
          Subcutaneous mass was diagnosed as an angiofibroma on Searle
          report.  The lesion is more consistent with an angiosarcoma.

      Female Rat No. K9MF (Path. No. 95707)
          Uterus - Polyp.

      Female Rat No. M1LF (Path. No. 95844)
          Tissue mass seen grossly was reported as missing and not
          available for microscopic examination.  The tissue was
          present and was a mammary fibroadenoma.

In summary, Dr. Frith reviewed:

     1)   All 36 high dose females (all slides) including 3 that had
          been excluded from the study due to autolysis.

     2)   36 (one-half) of the control females (all slides) including
          1 animal that had been excluded from the study due to auto-
          lysis.

     3)   Remaining 73 female animals with grossly observed masses.
          (sufficient slides were reviewed to substantiate the masses)

     4)   5 additional animals selected by the investigators (A1HM,
          A9HM, A29HM, C2CM, C24HM).

                           (67)

The slides reviewed in the first two categories above constituted 20% of
the total animals on the study.  Dr. Frith reviewed these slides blindly
and then compared his findings with the Searle microscopic reports.
According to Dr. Frith, his findings were in agreement with those of
SEarle, for the most part.  In his opinion, some of the lesions that he
reported as inconsistencies were small, and might be considered
insignificant by some pathologists.  Dr. Frith did feel, however, that the
ovarian neoplasms (animals H10CF, H19CF, and H7HP, and chronic cystitis
and diffuse hyperplasia (animal D29CF) should have been reported.

Dr. Frith also considered two other discrepancies to be significant.  They
were:

      1)  The reporting of a mass (by Searle) as missing which was
          actually present (MlLF).

      2)  The finding of a polyp of the uterus which was not diagnosed
          by Searle (K9MF)

The second of the above two discrepancies assumes even more significance
in view of the following:

The Histopathologic Summary table (table 11) in Volume I of the submission
to FDA lists the following incidence of Uterine Polyps on page 87:

                    Incidence of Uterine Polyps

      Controls         Low             Medium           High
      1 of 69          1 of 34         4 of 34          6 of 33
        (1%)             (3%)           (12%)            (18%)

The finding of one additional uterine polyp by Dr. Frith (in animal K9MF)
increases the incidence in the mid dose to 5 of 34 (15%).

On page 82 of Volume I of the submission to FDA, is the statement: "other
sporadic findings is included endometrial hyperplasia, polyp, cyst,
congestion and squamous metaplasia."  The term "sporadic findings" was
used to characterize the incidence of uterine polyps, in spite of the fact
that Searle had done a statistical analysis of these findings.

                           (68)

<=== Return to part 1    Next part... part 5 ===>



Wanna unload?


Name: Jerome Bressler
SUPVRY CONSUMER SAF FDA
Chicago Office
Mail stop HFR-MW140
Phone 312-353-5863
Fax 312-353-0947
Internet e-mail Dr. Jerome Bressler JBRESSLE@ORA.FDA.GOV



Or, communicate with HIS boss:

Name: Michael A. Friedman
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER FDA
Building PKLN Room 1471 Mail stop HF-28
5600 Fishers Ln.
Rockville MD 20857

Phone 301-827-3310
Fax 301-443-3100
Internet E-mail Dr. Michael Friedman MFRIEDMAN@OC.FDA.GOV



Or, communicate with HIS boss:

DHHS Donna Shalala hhsmail@os.dhhs.gov (Boss over FDA)



Or, communicate with HER boss:

The President president@whitehouse.gov

1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
Washington, D.C. 20500


Phone: (202) 456-1414
Fax: (202) 456-2883



Or... how about somebody in congress?

Congress http://www.dorway.com/congress.html



Last... but it should NOT be least...

Department Of Justice (DoJ) Janet Reno (DoJ) web@usdoj.gov




A few words about this document:

     This document appears on the Internet courtesy of whomever excercized the Freedom of Information Act request (and paid t he money to spring it), and the combined typing efforts of Betty Martini and myself.   The reader will note, that for whatever reasons a number of tables were blanked out before releasing this document. To the best of my knowledge, errors, poor grammar and other errors were kept intact.

     Should anyone desire a copy of this non-scanable copy (too many blemishes!) please send $10.00 to cover the cost of copying and second day shipping by USPS.   Please remit in postal money order or a readily cashable international medium.   A copy will not be sent until the cash is in hand!

David Rietz
122 Foxborough Road
Goose Creek, SC 29445

803-553-7896



"Aspartame is a Pandora's box of chameleon-like toxic chemicals, that causes cumulative physical and mental damage that hammer the unsuspecting victim into the ground... micro-dose by micro-dose!"


"Aspartam är en Pandoras ask med kameleont-liknande giftiga kemikalier, som orsakar kumulativa fysiska och mentala skador som slår det intet ont anande offret till marken...mikro-dos för mikro-dos!

Translation to Swedish courtesy of:
Cyrilla & Tomas Högberg cyrilla@algonet.se


Aspartaam is als een doos van Pandora met onstabiele giftige chemicaliën, die cumulatieve lichamelijke en geestelijke schade veroorzaken die het slachtoffer dat daar niet op verdacht is de grond in boort micro-dosis na micro-dosis!

Translation into Dutch courtesy of:
Ed Gunneweg egun@gemini.iaf.nl

index